Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourputt
Here's a hint... look through the decisions on Rule 27. 
If I hadn't just been reading them as I was trying to answer a similar question I'd have gotten it wrong too by winging it. |
Once someone has come up with it, could you share your thoughts on the situation if both balls are in the hazard?
Funnily enough, my thoughts on the original question are what the decision states as the strict interpretation, but then says something about changing that in equity. Namely that you can't ascertain either ball as the original or the provisional, so both are lost. That would have been my guess.