![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Rules & Situations What we think we know vs the Rule Book. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
If the score on a hole was recorded wrong by the marker, then they should be the one DQ'd.
Or if the marker added the score wrong and the player didn't catch it, they should both be DQ'd. If the player gave the marker a wrong score for his hole, then only the player should be DQ'd. At least that's MY opinion on the subject. ![]()
__________________
Texas Wedge In The Bag: MacTec NVG2 9.5 deg driver TaylorMade 200 Steel 3w & 5w Callaway x-16 Pro Irons Odyssey White Steel #5 Center Shafted Putter SkyCaddie SG5 "...I bow to your greater knowledge..." -- Lefty of GRW in response to one of my posts Winner of three 2007 Golf Rewound Pick Em Contests: Players Championship, US Open & PGA Championship ![]() Repeat Champion of the 2008 US Open Pick Em Contest |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
.
I hate to agree with the USGA on things like this but ultimately the accuracy of a player's score is the responsibility of the player. It's like running a business. If one of my guys damages something at someone's house - even if I wasn't on the job when it happened - I'm still responsible for it because I own the company. A player should keep track of his own scores, compare notes afterwards and don't sign anything until all are in agreement. When you point a finger at someone, there are three other fingers pointing right back at you. -JP
__________________
My Bag: Driver: TM R7 425 TP, 9.5 deg. / UST ProForce V2 75X (tipped 1/2") 3-Wood: Nike SQ3+ 13 deg./TT EI70X 4-Wood: Nike SQ4, 17 deg. / Rifle MT85S (graphite) Irons 2-PW: Snake Eyes 600C All lofts +1.5 deg.'Hot' DG X-100 soft-stepped 1/2". Wedge: 51 deg. Snake Eyes 655TM Putter: Odyssey Dual Force #2 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
DQ the marker? Not practical. What if his card is correct and he wins the tournament even without the DQ of the other player? How do you justify that? |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
They review each hole stroke by stroke several times before signing the card. If that is too much to ask of players who are in important tournaments or events, then they deserve what they get, no matter how careless the marker is. And it is no excuse for a marker to claim that he wrote down what the player told him he made on a hole. The whole idea behind the system is that the marker is supposed to observe the player and write down the score he observes, not what the player says. |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
I've seen this happen in several junior events, twice with the winner and once for the winner of their Tournament of Champions. My son was called over just 15 min before the winning group came in and was also told 'he had a mistake on his scorecard'....evidently, it was the 'good kind' of mistake....he just had the total wrong (still careless). The rules state that you have to only have the correct scores for the individual holes....the player is not responsible to total the scores or, if he put 479 down for the total, insted of 79, it still will not be wrong. However, a wrong score for an individual hole....if marked higher than what it was supposed to be, you keep the higher score....if mistakenly written lower that what is supposed to be, you are DQ'd. (I guess in the latter case, it is considered 'cheating' whereas in the former case, you are excused for carelessness by being given the higher score than what you whould have received if not careless).
After 15 min, the final group came in, the prevailing youngster was listed on the board as "1st Place", given the 4-foot high trophy and was all smiles.....until, the scorer's table said there's a discrepency between what they totalled and what was listed on the final score.....after finding out that one hole was incorrectly written lower than what the boy got (he still would have won), he was DQ'd and the fellow who was the marker ended up winning the tournament....that's the part I don't like. Hmm...AF, Bradenton?... home of the David Leadbetter Academy? Quote:
__________________
Regards, -Bulls9999 ---------------------------------------------- Ping 'Anser' putter w/Jumbo Tiger Shark grip TaylorMade r7 425cc 10.5° driver w/ReAx 65 (Reg) Callaway X-3W (15°, Fujikura 26.3 TP, Stiff) Titleist 52°, 56°, 60° Vokey-256 wedges TM 3- and 4- Dual Rescue Hybrids Callaway X-20 Tour (Precision X flighted, 5.5 flex) Titleist ProV1 & Callaway HX Tour Titleist X66 Stand Bag HDCP = 14.9 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
OH, I don't like the fact the the in the last round of a multi-round tournament, in the group in contention, the marker is often also in contention and his 'mistake' costs someone a tournament (yes, by their own carelessness too) but he could be the benificiary of the DQ and end up winning....causes many to wonder if it was done purposely with perhaps that intent. I would say suggest ammending this rule to give both people, player and marker a 2-stroke penalty. But that's not what the current rules offer, that could only be changed for the future.
__________________
Regards, -Bulls9999 ---------------------------------------------- Ping 'Anser' putter w/Jumbo Tiger Shark grip TaylorMade r7 425cc 10.5° driver w/ReAx 65 (Reg) Callaway X-3W (15°, Fujikura 26.3 TP, Stiff) Titleist 52°, 56°, 60° Vokey-256 wedges TM 3- and 4- Dual Rescue Hybrids Callaway X-20 Tour (Precision X flighted, 5.5 flex) Titleist ProV1 & Callaway HX Tour Titleist X66 Stand Bag HDCP = 14.9 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
Mark Roe springs to mind, in the Open, and after all these guys were JUNIORS.
__________________
GOLF TRADITIONALIST "Been there, Done that, But won't wear a T-Shirt" In the bag. Cleveland Launcher Ti 460 'S' 10.5* ProGen 3wood 'S' 3 - Wedge Wilson Staff Pi5's 'X' 54* 56* & 60* Hippo Wedges Ping 'MyDay' Putter Playing with Titleist ProV 1's HCP:- UK 5.6 US +1.2 Last edited by Fileygolfer : 01-31-2008 at 05:00 AM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
AND:- At the end of the day who says that an entered score was lower than what was taken. How often is it The Marker?
One of my friends once was drawn with a certain German Pro (Masters Champ) and as they shook hands walking off the 18th he was asked "Now what did you get on the 1st?". His card had not been filled in all the way round.
__________________
GOLF TRADITIONALIST "Been there, Done that, But won't wear a T-Shirt" In the bag. Cleveland Launcher Ti 460 'S' 10.5* ProGen 3wood 'S' 3 - Wedge Wilson Staff Pi5's 'X' 54* 56* & 60* Hippo Wedges Ping 'MyDay' Putter Playing with Titleist ProV 1's HCP:- UK 5.6 US +1.2 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
What better time to learn how to do it correctly? He probably won't make that mistake again.
__________________
Rick Driver - Mizuno MX560 9.5° 3W - Mizuno F60 15° 4W - Mizuno F60 16.5° 22° - 25° TM Rescue hybrid 6I - PW King Cobra 3400I/XH GW - King Cobra - 50° SW - Cleveland CG 11 56° 58° Callaway X Tour wedge Putter - USS Enterprise NCC 1701 (Golfsmith component) Bushnell Pinseeker Tour V2 11.1 USGA Index Home Course - Foothills Golf Course, Colorado |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
And we all learned how to do it correctly by being DQ'd in a European Final Event at 14yrs old.
I don't know what the mistake was because they didn't say but WHO brought the mistake to the scorers attention. If a "Marker" puts the scores for two holes the wrong way round (4 - 3 instead of 3 - 4) and signs the card before handing it to the "Player" who totals it, thinks its correct, signs it and posts it. The "Marker" then remembers what he did and tells the Recorder and the "Player" is DQ'd. As an experienced player I always check each holes score before signing. But a youngster in a Large Finals Event should be helped by the Recorder. I will always but a large part of the blame for Mark Roes DQ in the Open on the Recorder. If the card was wrong and a DQ in the offering why did he say "Good round Mr Roe" when it had Jasper Parnaviks name on the card??????? Golf should be won by the player who plays the best and scores the best and not only the ones that have "A Level" Maths and know the RofG inside out.
__________________
GOLF TRADITIONALIST "Been there, Done that, But won't wear a T-Shirt" In the bag. Cleveland Launcher Ti 460 'S' 10.5* ProGen 3wood 'S' 3 - Wedge Wilson Staff Pi5's 'X' 54* 56* & 60* Hippo Wedges Ping 'MyDay' Putter Playing with Titleist ProV 1's HCP:- UK 5.6 US +1.2 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Filey, yes, in your example (transposed scores for two holes, added up, comes up the same as the total....no one would notice except perhaps the player or the marker), it is not likely to be found out by the officials at the scorers table unless brought to their attention by the player or the marker. However, in some tournaments, I've noticed they post all the individual hole scores for the players on a big bulletin board, and then while they are are waiting for everyone to finish, they have time to glance at the board, where it may come to mind that there's a mistake. But where they don't post individual scores on such a board, it is out of mind by both marker and player after they hand the cards in.
In the examples I gave (real events with juniors), it was a mistake written by the marker on a hole, then asking the player what he got for a total and writing that down without adding, or some such. The player likely gave a cursory glance over, signed and submitted it. The scorers then added up the individual holes and noticed that his/her total doesn't match the totals written....now they have to find out where the error is and thats when they call the marker and the player back in, to find out if the error is with the total or with one of the individual hole scores. At least, from what I gather in the current AJGA juniors, the entire group sits at a table with the score official who seems to be asking them to check over everything before signing, etc, as it seems to take them 5-10 min at that table for whatever reason. As opposed to the type of junior tournaments I've seen where they simply provide a table for the juniors to sit at and tally their score on their own before handing them in and then the officials look at the scores vs totals afterwards...perhaps this is where I've seen most of these types of mistakes. Quote:
__________________
Regards, -Bulls9999 ---------------------------------------------- Ping 'Anser' putter w/Jumbo Tiger Shark grip TaylorMade r7 425cc 10.5° driver w/ReAx 65 (Reg) Callaway X-3W (15°, Fujikura 26.3 TP, Stiff) Titleist 52°, 56°, 60° Vokey-256 wedges TM 3- and 4- Dual Rescue Hybrids Callaway X-20 Tour (Precision X flighted, 5.5 flex) Titleist ProV1 & Callaway HX Tour Titleist X66 Stand Bag HDCP = 14.9 Last edited by Bulls9999 : 01-31-2008 at 04:27 PM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
I see your point about markers making mistakes but the rules say that the player is ultimately responsible for his own scorecard. How hard is it to record the number of strokes you take on a specific hole in the corresponding box on a scorecard? The rules even excuse any errors in addition a player may make so any 2nd grader should be able to record an error free scorecard. Mistakes are made by carelessness and lack of attention. I've never signed a scorecard with someone else's name on it. Have you? |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
Every time this topic comes up, it's because someone feels that he, or somebody close to him, has been wronged by the rules. But I've never seen a pro blame anyone but himself for making such a blunder. Age should have nothing to do with it. I have a friend whose grandson is 4. He will competing this season with 7 and 8 year olds (the youngest organized junior tournament level available), and he is required to attend a class on the Rules and Etiquette before the start of the season... that's 10 years younger than your young player. He actually learned to count by counting strokes on the golf course before he was 3. I still say, if that's what it takes to learn the lesson, then so be it. ![]()
__________________
Rick Driver - Mizuno MX560 9.5° 3W - Mizuno F60 15° 4W - Mizuno F60 16.5° 22° - 25° TM Rescue hybrid 6I - PW King Cobra 3400I/XH GW - King Cobra - 50° SW - Cleveland CG 11 56° 58° Callaway X Tour wedge Putter - USS Enterprise NCC 1701 (Golfsmith component) Bushnell Pinseeker Tour V2 11.1 USGA Index Home Course - Foothills Golf Course, Colorado |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
The 'rules are the rules', but rules can be changed. In my opinion, I would rather see something to the effect of penalizing a player (and the marker) a few strokes for incorrect score reporting rather than DQ. IMO, the mistake has nothing to do with golf performance and should not be that penal as a DQ.
Quote:
__________________
Regards, -Bulls9999 ---------------------------------------------- Ping 'Anser' putter w/Jumbo Tiger Shark grip TaylorMade r7 425cc 10.5° driver w/ReAx 65 (Reg) Callaway X-3W (15°, Fujikura 26.3 TP, Stiff) Titleist 52°, 56°, 60° Vokey-256 wedges TM 3- and 4- Dual Rescue Hybrids Callaway X-20 Tour (Precision X flighted, 5.5 flex) Titleist ProV1 & Callaway HX Tour Titleist X66 Stand Bag HDCP = 14.9 |
|
||||
|
Re: Another strange ruling?
Quote:
If you saw the Official Open Championship scorecard you would see straight away how this mistake was made. The name is placed in such a position that any Local Rules\Pin Placements stapled to it, covers the name that in the first place is usually fainter than the rest of the card. Mark agreed that he was stupid to forget to swop cards but a DQ for not having broken any of the RofG. He took it very well.
__________________
GOLF TRADITIONALIST "Been there, Done that, But won't wear a T-Shirt" In the bag. Cleveland Launcher Ti 460 'S' 10.5* ProGen 3wood 'S' 3 - Wedge Wilson Staff Pi5's 'X' 54* 56* & 60* Hippo Wedges Ping 'MyDay' Putter Playing with Titleist ProV 1's HCP:- UK 5.6 US +1.2 |